I think using the relationship between the creature and Victor is a great idea. Why does Victor, who has grown up with so much love, recoil from and reject his creation? After all, the monster is his child. He created it. How can a person who knows he has benefitted from love deny that to his creation? What does this tell us about Victor's notions of love? Has he learned in his childhood that only beautiful creatures are lovable? Is this a blind spot in his understanding of the world? Perhaps you could find a quote that shows what he hates in the creature, and that perhaps they are only outward aspects, like his appearance. Is Victor shallow?
Although the creature is the "child," he appears to be—at least initially, before he is hurt and lashes out violently from the pain of the severe rejection he experiences—emotionally wiser and more loving than the "man," Frankenstein, his "father." This seems to me a very Romantic notion. After all, the quintessential Romantic poet, William Wordsworth used the line "the Child is Father of the Man" in his famous poem "My Heart Leaps Up." You could explore how Victor's loving childhood has led him to place too much emphasis on the powers of intellect and reason, making him lose the innate power of loving that the "child" Frankenstein still retains. Is Victor's intellectual knowledge a barrier to love? Does Mary Shelley mean for us to feel sympathy and compassion for the creature rejected by its maker?
I do believe that Shelley wants us realize that we need to get beyond ourselves and our own egos if we are truly going to become loving toward another, especially toward one that is not like us. Not being able to love the creature, who so longs for love and acceptance, costs Victor not just a relationship with the creature but the lives of the people he loves.
No comments:
Post a Comment