On your point 3, I would argue that in viewing Blanche, to use words such as "degenerate" and "promiscuous" is somewhat unhelpful. The value judgments attached to such terms in her case, I believe, are unrealistic and unfair. But an awareness of what I would consider a problem with the way the question is worded can lead to an answer to the "deeper" question that lies behind Blanche's personality and that of Stanley, and of Stella, as well.
Like every real person, the characters in Streetcar are a mixture of different qualities, both "good" and "bad." Even Stanley, though the emphasis is on his crudeness and abusiveness shown in his physically violent behavior, appears to love Stella in his way. The Kowalskis are a working-class couple, removed from the rarefied world Stella and Blanche originally are from. Blanche is, in fact, charming and sensitive. Her love for her husband, whom she discovered to be gay, was genuine, and the shock of finding this out about him and his subsequent suicide threw her life off course. A reader, especially in our time, who does not sympathize with her would have to be extremely cold-hearted and unforgiving, in my opinion.
It is not surprising that the antagonism between Blanche and Stanley should increase as the play progresses and they continue to interact with each other, given that the two of them are not "on the same page" to begin with. Whether she and Mitch could have had a successful marriage is anyone's guess. Mitch is a blue-collar person like Stanley, but without the latter's cruelty. Though he and Blanche come from different social backgrounds, such a difference is not always an impediment to a successful pairing in real life, so it's possible that these two could have been successful as well had not Stanley destroyed it for both of them.
No comments:
Post a Comment