As is often the case in Hamlet, one can never know for sure what Hamlet is aware of or what he's thinking. My interpretation is that he probably does realize that Ophelia has been sent to him so that her father and Claudius can observe his actions and get some clue to whatever it is they fear Hamlet intends to do. This, of course, does not excuse or explain the cruelty of his behavior toward her, nor does it answer the question of how much of Hamlet's "madness" is real and how much is feigned. Part of the greatness of the play is rooted in this very ambiguity, in the openness to interpretation of Hamlet's mental state and his feelings towards Ophelia.
Most commentators have seemed to think that whatever the reality of his personal anguish, Hamlet is laying it on thick to make Ophelia believe he is insane. It can be argued that the following lines do indicate he also knows that the King and Polonius are eavesdropping:
I say we will have no more marriages. Those that are already married, all but one, shall live. The rest shall keep as they are.
The "one" probably means Claudius, whom Hamlet intends to kill. In my view, this is a threat he intends Claudius to hear. Earlier in the tirade, Hamlet already appears suspicious that Polonius may be listening in, when he asks Ophelia where her father is. When she says he's at home, his response is:
Let the doors be shut upon him, that he may play the fool nowhere but in's own house.
There is no special reason Hamlet should believe Ophelia that Polonius is at home, and the insulting remark he makes is probably one intended to be heard by him. Hamlet obviously thinks Polonius is a fool, though to this point he hasn't said so in such direct words. The statement may also be a warning to Polonius to stay out of the conflict between Hamlet and the King—that it is none of Polonius's business.
That said, there is no explicit proof that Hamlet knows Claudius and Polonius are listening. My view is only that it seems probable. One could also argue that he would not have poured his soul out in the "To be or not to be" soliloquy preceding this if he had any suspicions people were eavesdropping. But as stated, the fact of ambiguity and multiple interpretations is one of Shakespeare's strengths.
Friday, September 7, 2012
In the so-called "Nunnery scene,” do you think that Hamlet knows that he's being watched? Can you find any evidence of his awareness?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Summarize the major research findings of "Toward an experimental ecology of human development."
Based on findings of prior research, the author, Bronfenbrenner proposes that methods for natural observation research have been applied in ...
-
The Awakening is told from a third-person omniscient point of view. It is tempting to say that it is limited omniscient because the narrator...
-
Roger is referred to as the "dark boy." He is a natural sadist who becomes the "official" torturer and executioner of Ja...
-
One way to support this thesis is to explain how these great men changed the world. Indeed, Alexander the Great (356–323 BC) was the quintes...
-
After the inciting incident, where Daniel meets his childhood acquaintance Joel in the mountains outside the village, the rising action begi...
-
The major difference that presented itself between American and British Romantic works was their treatment of the nation and its history. Th...
-
The Southern economy was heavily dependent upon slave labor. The Southern economy was agrarian; agriculture was its lifeblood, and being abl...
-
The first step in answering the question is to note that it conflates two different issues, sensation-seeking behavior and risk. One good ap...
No comments:
Post a Comment