The answer to your question appears to be self-evident—the account in Luke is how he would have edited Mark's—because both passages seem to refer to the same incident, although there are a few differences in detail. Jesus is invited to eat in the house of a man named Simon. While he is there, a woman acknowledged to be a sinner appears and uses ointment from an alabaster box to wash Jesus. In each account, Jesus justifies the woman's actions and speaks highly of her.
To account for the discrepancies in the narratives and why Luke would have written and edited Mark's version differently, it's important to remember two things: the two writers have vastly different styles, and neither writer was present when the incident at Simon's house took place. They are both basing their writings on stories that they have heard from eyewitnesses or even from second- or third-hand sources.
Neither of the two writers was one of Jesus's original twelve apostles. Although it's impossible to definitively determine who wrote the gospels, scholars are fairly sure about who Mark and Luke were. Mark was John Mark, also known as Mark the Evangelist, who accompanied Paul and Barnabas on their early missionary journeys. He most likely received his stories about Jesus from the apostle Peter. His gospel accounts are known for their brevity. Luke is traditionally known as a Greek physician who accompanied Paul on his journeys, and his gospel was probably written later than Mark's. The gospel of Luke, in contrast to Mark's gospel, is the longest of the four gospels and gives much more extended accounts of incidents in the life of Jesus.
Although Mark's gospel was probably written before Luke's, it's doubtful that Luke merely edited and extended Mark's account of the incident at Simon's house. The first few paragraphs of Luke make it clear that he investigated stories from numerous eyewitnesses and other sources before writing his gospel.
Let us first examine some of the differences. Mark's account tells readers that Jesus was in Bethany at the house of Simon the Leper. Those details are not included in Luke's account. In both accounts, a woman pours perfume onto Jesus, but while Mark states that the perfume was poured on his head, Luke's account says the perfume was poured on his feet. Luke's account also adds in a parable that Jesus tells about a moneylender, and he forgives the woman's sins. This is a big difference because Mark's account has Jesus telling everyone that the woman is preparing him for his death and burial.
As for why this particular story is different, there are a variety of possibilities.
Two different eyewitnesses will produce two different renditions of the same story. Each person will notice slightly different things and choose to highlight each of those things in a particular account.
Mark most likely was not there in the first place. Mark is not one of the original disciples, so it stands to reason that he was not there in the first place. He is writing down what he has been told to write down (most likely by Peter).
It is two different events. It is completely possible that the woman is not the same woman and that Christ was bathed in expensive perfume on more than one occasion.
The intended audiences are different, so the author is choosing to highlight certain aspects of Christ and his actions and words. Luke is writing to the Gentiles, and Mark is writing to the Galilean Christians.
https://www.allaboutjesuschrist.org/the-purpose-of-the-gospel-of-mark-faq.htm
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/story/luke.html
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/religion/story/mark.html
No comments:
Post a Comment