Tuesday, October 3, 2017

What archetypal character does Tom Simson represent?

Tom is known at "the innocent" of Sandy Bar, but really the archetype that best fits him is "the child," because he is endlessly optimistic, hopelessly naive, loyal to a fault, and mainly concerned with happiness. We know few basic things about Tom: he is terrible at poker; he has run off with his girl friend, Piney Woods, to get married in Poker Flats, against the wishes of her father; and he is loyal to the gambler Oakhurst, who did him a good turn by winning all of Tom's money, then taking him aside and telling him never to gamble again and giving the money back.
In fact, it is Tom's optimism that gets the travelers in trouble, since he insists they stay the night in the cabin even with bad weather threatening. Even after they are snowed in, Tom continues to see the bright side, saying that they will be snug in the cabin "for a week" until the snow melts. In fact, the purity of Tom and Piney softens or inspires the other travelers. Even Mother Shipton sacrifices her food (and life) for the sake of the "kids."


Tom Simson represents the character archetype known as "The Innocent." In fact, that's exactly how he's referred to in the story itself. And Tom certainly displays all the character traits associated with this archetype. He's wholesome, a little naive perhaps, but bursting with optimism. He's a genuine all-round nice guy, always keen to please and keener still to help others in need. We see this towards the end of the story when he ventures out into the snow to get help for Oakhurst and the other stranded travelers. 
A downside of the "Innocent" archetype is that they are easily led, too trusting. For instance, in the case of Tom, he remains in awe of Oakhurst despite the fact that he once lost a lot of money to him at the poker table. The boundless optimism of the "innocents" blinds them to their own weaknesses, making it easier for them to be exploited and manipulated by others. These are certainly not the characteristics of someone hoping to make money at poker. No wonder Oakhurst advises Tom never to play the game again.

Monday, October 2, 2017

What are the conventions of comedy and tragedy in Shakespeare or literature in general?

The conventions in Shakespearean tragedy are largely the same as those identified by Aristotle. In Shakespeare, as in Aristotle's Poetics, a tragedy
has a sympathetic hero who is of noble birth, or more generally who begins the play in an elevated social position;
involves this character falling from grace and succumbing to disaster because of his own behavior;
showcases the character's "fatal flaw," which causes this behavior;
and provides some kind of catharsis for the audience.
In Shakespearean tragedy, the "disaster" is almost always a death; generally, Shakespeare's tragedies end in the deaths of not only the protagonist but several of those around him.
The elements of a Shakespearean comedy are rather less well defined. In the first place, a "comedy" may not be a comedy in modern terms--it is a "comedy" only in that it does not end in tragedy. Some of Shakespeare's comedies--like The Comedy of Errors--are closer to our modern understanding, with most scenes geared towards making the audience laugh. However, others, like As You Like It, contain a lot of dramatic material as well.
Elements frequently found in Shakespeare's comedies are, nonetheless, ones we still recognize in comedies today. Confusion and cases of mistaken identity form the basis for much Shakespearean comedy. Shakespearean comedies also frequently have romantic plots and end in a marriage.

In Walk Two Moons, what are some examples of Sal's grandparents getting into trouble?

Sal’s Gram and Gramps Hiddle are an unpredictable pair. They have a peculiar line of reasoning for decision-making that doesn’t always make sense to others. In Chapter 5, Sal tells about a trip to Washington, D.C., when her grandparents “borrowed” the tires off a senator’s car, their own tires being flat (Sal explains that this is something that one could do in Bybanks, but not in the nation’s capital). In the same chapter, Gramps tries to help a woman who is having car trouble, only ending up tearing out all the hoses from her engine.
In Chapter 15, Sal and her grandparents stop by the river for a quick swim. As they are approached by a suspicious boy, who claims that they are on private property, a poisonous snake bites Gram. Though they are able to get her to the hospital for help, she is never quite the same after that.
In Chapter 41, when Gram is in the hospital following a stroke, Gramps gives Sal the keys to the car, even though she is underage and unlicensed. She reaches her destination, but she encounters the sheriff. Though he helps her with the task of finding the spot where her mother’s bus went off the road, he takes her back to town to Gramps, but due to Gram's death, he does not serve Gramps with any consequences for allowing Sal to drive.
Gram and Gramps find themselves in trouble mainly through their good intentions and unfamiliarity with the “wider” world. Though Sal’s father says that he should have just called the police as soon as they left the driveway, they never intentionally seek to cause trouble. Trouble finds them anyway, but their innocence usually keeps them out of serious mischief.

sum_(n=1)^oo n/(n^4+2n^2+1) Confirm that the Integral Test can be applied to the series. Then use the Integral Test to determine the convergence or divergence of the series.

sum_(n=1)^oon/(n^4+2n^2+1)
The integral test is applicable if f is positive, continuous and decreasing function on the infinite interval [k,oo) where k>=1 and a_n=f(x) . Then the series converges or diverges if and only if the improper integral int_k^oof(x)dx converges or diverges.
For the given series a_n=n/(n^4+2n^2+1)
Consider f(x)=x/(x^4+2x^2+1)
f(x)=x/(x^2+1)^2
From the attached graph of the function, we can see that the function is continuous, positive and decreasing on the interval [1,oo)
We can also determine whether f(x) is decreasing by finding the derivative f'(x) such that f'(x)<0 for x>=1 .
Apply the quotient rule to find the derivative,
f'(x)=((x^2+1)^2d/dx(x)-xd/dx(x^2+1)^2)/(x^2+1)^4
f'(x)=((x^2+1)^2-x(2(x^2+1)2x))/(x^2+1)^4
f'(x)=((x^2+1)(x^2+1-4x^2))/(x^2+1)^4
f'(x)=(-3x^2+1)/(x^2+1)^3
f'(x)=-(3x^2-1)/(x^2+1)^3<0
Since the function satisfies the conditions for the integral test, we can apply the integral test.
Now let's determine the convergence or divergence of the improper integral as follows:
int_1^oox/(x^2+1)^2dx=lim_(b->oo)int_1^bx/(x^2+1)^2dx
Let's first evaluate the indefinite integral intx/(x^2+1)^2dx
Apply integral substitution:u=x^2+1
=>du=2xdx
intx/(x^2+1)^2dx=int1/(u^2)(du)/2
=1/2int1/u^2du
Apply the power rule,
=1/2(u^(-2+1)/(-2+1))
=-1/(2u)
Substitute back u=(x^2+1)
=-1/(2(x^2+1))+C  where C is a constant
Now int_1^oox/(x^2+1)^2dx=lim_(b->oo)[-1/(2(x^2+1))]_1^b
=lim_(b->oo)-1/2[1/(b^2+1)-1/(1^2+1)]
=-1/2[0-1/2]
=1/4
Since the integral int_1^oox/(x^4+2x^2+1)dx converges, we conclude from the integral test that the series sum_(n=1)^oon/(n^4+2n^2+1) converges.

How does The Glass Menagerie symbolize Laura's escape from reality?

The glass menagerie symbolizes the various facets of Laura's personality in many respects. For one thing, her collection of glass animals is very fragile and delicate, just like Laura herself. It also constitutes a world of its own, a miniature kingdom where everything is impeccably neat, orderly, and in its proper place. Laura feels safe in this world, far away from the disordered harshness of everyday life, where everything seems so scary, and where she always feels so terribly shy and insecure.
The little glass creatures belong to Laura; she gets to control them in a way that she could never hope to control herself, let alone the people and events in her life. The fantasy world that Laura has built for herself reflects Tennessee Williams's entire aesthetic approach in constructing The Glass Menagerie. In writing the play, Williams wanted to show that the product of the subjective imagination was more real than the minute objective detail presented to us by dramatic realism.
Yet this world of the imagination, though more real, is by the same token more prone to destruction. Laura's glass menagerie, like herself, and indeed like art in general, is achingly vulnerable to a sudden unwelcome intrusion from the world of the everyday. Laura is simply too precious for this harsh and cruel world. And although her glass menagerie allows her a momentary escape from this world, it can only ever provide temporary respite.
For Tennessee Williams, much the same could be said about art. However much heightened reality art can give us, however much of an elevated insight into the human condition it can provide, we still have to live our daily lives in the midst of a world that can all too often be so terribly cruel and unpleasant. At various times in our lives, Laura's world is our world too.

Single Variable Calculus, Chapter 3, 3.6, Section 3.6, Problem 25

Find an equation of the tangent to the curve $x^2 + xy + y^2 = 3$ at the point $(1,1)$ using Implicit Differentiation.

If $y'=m\text{ (slope)}$ then
$\displaystyle \frac{d}{dx} (x^2) + \frac{d}{dx} (xy) + \frac{d}{dx} (y^2) = \frac{d}{dx} (3)$

$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
\frac{d}{dx} (x^2) + \left[ (x) \frac{d}{dx} (y) + (y) \frac{d}{dx} (x) \right] + \frac{d}{dx} (y^2) &= \frac{d}{dx} (3)\\
\\
2x + (x) \frac{dy}{dx} + (y)(1) + 2y \frac{dy}{dx} &= 0\\
\\
2x + xy' + y + 2yy' &= 0\\
\\
xy'+2yy' &= -2x-y\\
\\
y'(x+2y) &= -2x-y\\
\\
\frac{y'\cancel{(x+2y)}}{\cancel{x+2y}} &= \frac{-2x-y}{x+2y}\\
\\
y' = m &= \frac{-2x-y}{x+2y}
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$


For $x =1 $ and $y = 1 $ , we have

$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
m &= \frac{-2(1)-1}{1+2(1)}\\
\\
m &= \frac{-2-1}{1+2}\\
\\
m &= \frac{-3}{3}\\
\\
m &= -1
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$


Using point slope form,



$
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
y-y_1 &= m (x-x_1)\\
\\
y - 1 &= -1 (x-1)\\
\\
y - 1 &= -x + 1\\
\\
y &= -x + 1 +1 \\
\\
y & = -x + 2 && \text{Equation of the tangent at } (1,1)
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
$

Sunday, October 1, 2017

How does Abigail Williams use pathos when accusing Elizabeth of witchcraft in The Crucible?

Before we get to your question about Arthur Miller's The Crucible, let us first look at the definition of your chosen term (provided here by Carson-Newman University):

PATHOS (Greek, 'emotion'): In its rhetorical sense, pathos is a writer or speaker's attempt to inspire an emotional reaction in an audience—usually a deep feeling of suffering, but sometimes joy, pride, anger, humor, patriotism, or any of a dozen other emotions...In its critical sense, pathos signifies a scene or passage designed to evoke the feeling of pity or sympathetic sorrow in a reader or viewer.

It helps to think of Abigail Williams as the author of her very own play-within-a-play. She performs for the crowd using pathos to "evoke the feeling of pity or sympathetic sorrow." This occurs many times throughout the play; she feeds off the emotions of those around her in order to manipulate them. In the case of The Crucible, the most prevalent emotion is that of fear—fear of witchcraft and fear of accusation.
After being caught dancing in the forest late at night with a group of friends, Abigail confesses that there is nothing untoward going on: "Uncle, we did dance; let you tell them I confessed it. But they're speakin' of witchcraft; Betty's not witched." When she sees the adults around her getting worked up over the possibility of witchcraft, she then blames everything on "Tituba and Ruth." Knowing, as Betty explains a short time later, that she "drank blood" that night, she knows there might be grave repercussions for those actions. Thus, when Betty continues to mention it, she uses Pathos for the first time:

ABIGAIL: [...] Now look you. All of you. We danced. And Tituba conjured Ruth Putnam's dead sisters. And that is all. And mark this-let either of you breathe a word, or the edge of a word about the other things, and I will come to you in the black of some terrible night and I will bring a pointy reckoning that will shudder you. And you know I can do it. I can make you wish you had never seen the sun goes down!

Clearly shaken by everything that has happened thus far, Betty's emotional condition leads others to enter the room. This leads Abigail to claim that it started while they were praying, which only feeds their fears of witchcraft. Though this example does not directly answer your question, it does give some background into how Abigail learns to manipulate those around her using pathos.
After Abigail's advances toward John Proctor—a man with whom she was previously engaged in an affair—are rebuffed, she begins setting her sights on Elizabeth, his wife: "She is blackening my name in the village! She is telling lies about me! She is a cold sniveling woman and you bend to her!" Here, Abigail uses pathos to win John's affections. When that doesn't work, the begins to employ a much stronger plan.
While it is not shown in the play, Abigail's strongest use of pathos comes when she (presumably) stabs herself in the stomach with a needle. Ezekiel Cheever, a clerk of the court, explains what happened:

CHEEVER: The girl, the Williams girl, Abigail Williams, sir. She sat to dinner in Reverend Parris' house tonight, and without word nor warnin', she falls to the floor. Like a struck beast, he says, and screamed a scream that a bull would weep to hear. And he goes to save her, and stuck two inches in the flesh of the belly he draw a needle out. And demandin' of her how she come to be so stabbed, she... (To Proctor) testify it were your wife's familiar spirit pushed it in.

Now, most people would have a tough time believing Abigail would have done this to herself. Without knowledge of her affair with John or her attempt to get him to leave his wife, Abigail would seem like an innocent victim—even with the absurd claim that Elizabeth's "spirit" was the perpetrator. However, by this point in the play it has been shown that Abigail will go to great lengths to gain John's love, so it is safe (for the audience) to assume she stabbed herself and used the town's fear of witchcraft to try to get rid of Elizabeth.
Throughout the play, Abigail employs pathos in her behavior toward just about every other character in the play. For further study you can look into Abigail's behavior in court, where she employs pathos when she turns on Mary—who has testified on Elizabeth's innocence. Additionally, you can explore the beginning of the play, where she also turns on and blames Tituba for the events in the woods.


As the previous answer describes, pathos as a literary device has to do with an appeal to the emotions. In addition to Abigail's performative behavior, in which she appeals to the emotions of the present at Reverend Parris's house, she also creates a sort of narrative about Elizabeth Proctor that reflects on her statements and behaviors with others. She has two primary goals: to clear her name of accusation that she herself was trafficking with Satan in the woods and to win the affection of John Proctor. She thinks her hold over Proctor is much stronger than it is, and given her youth, Proctor feels somewhat guilty for his part in their affair in addition to the guilt he feels over cheating on Elizabeth. Abigail is aware of Proctor's complex emotions where she is concerned and goes out of her way to appeal to the passion she still thinks he holds for her. Unfortunately for Abigail, his sense of integrity and honor is stronger than his sexual feelings for her.
As Proctor begins to get an idea of just how far Abigail will go, in accusing Elizabeth of witchcraft, his previous pity for her turns to anger and outrage, and his rage unbalances him in his participation in the courtroom proceedings. It may be that Abigail also maneuvered this outcome: knowing Proctor has intense emotions, she may have considered how this might intensify his behavior and thereby make others judge him more harshly. By weakening Proctor, Abigail thought she could get him to turn to her, but by attacking Elizabeth, Abigail only succeed in strengthening Proctor's resolve to expose her lies and vindictiveness.


Pathos is a rhetorical device concerned with making an appeal to the emotions. Abigail Williams, in The Crucible, is a character whose wild accusations of witchcraft are based purely and solely on emotional foundations. This distinguishes her from Reverend Hale, among others, who tries to use logos or logical argument to persuade others that the accused are guilty.
While eating at Parris's house Abigail screams and falls to the floor, claiming she has been stabbed by Elizabeth's evil spirit using the doll that Mary Warren had given her. (She actually stabbed herself; this shows just how much she wants to destroy Elizabeth). She is effectively accusing Elizabeth of being a witch and using the seventeenth century equivalent of a voodoo doll to harm her.
The accusation is obviously ridiculous; the needle is used for sewing and has been stuck into the doll by Mary to keep it from being lost. However, Abigail is not trying to convince anyone on logical, rational grounds; she is appealing to the emotions. By this point in the play, emotions in Salem are running very high, so high, in fact, that in an atmosphere of near total hysteria people are prepared to believe just about any accusation of witchcraft no matter how demonstrably ridiculous.

Summarize the major research findings of &quot;Toward an experimental ecology of human development.&quot;

Based on findings of prior research, the author, Bronfenbrenner proposes that methods for natural observation research have been applied in ...