Each of these characters from "Barn Burning" has a very different perspective on events, and the story would be radically different if told from a different point of view.
If Abner Snopes told the story, it would be an angry story that would be difficult to get through. Readers usually want to feel sympathy for the main character or protagonist of a story, and Abner is such a self-centered person that he would make himself the main character—but readers would have a hard time liking him or wanting him to succeed. He would describe the initial hearing of the story as if it were a great victory for himself, spoiled only by his addle-brained son Sarty, whom he quickly taught a lesson about blood loyalty.
Likewise, he would praise his own actions in getting the better of the de Spains by smearing excrement on their rug and then setting their barn on fire. We would probably hear how he escaped that event without being apprehended and how glad he was to be rid of his traitorous son once and for all. (Since Abner reappears in other Faulkner stories, we must assume he survives this one, even though the story seems to suggest he dies.)
This story is already told almost completely from Sarty's perspective. It shows us how he wants to be able to take his dad's side, but the more he understands about his dad's actions and values, the more he realizes he can't be a part of his way of life.
The story told from Mrs. Snopes's point of view could be boring or it could be fascinating. Faulkner gave us little insight into what motivates Mrs. Snopes or how she feels about her husband and her lifestyle. Certainly, she was embarrassed and unhappy about her husband's arsonist tendencies, which meant she could never settle down in a community.
Her story might explain that she was trapped in a relationship with an angry and unkind man but felt she had no other options. It would no doubt describe her mixed feelings when Abner requires Sarty to go with him to burn down the de Spain barn. She would relate how she wanted to protect Sarty and how she feared what Abner would do to her if she were to cross him.
To have this story told from the viewpoint of a community member would be interesting. It would resemble another famous story by William Faulkner, "A Rose for Emily." In that story, the actions of a mentally unstable woman are related from the perspective of the townspeople who gossiped about her but never truly got to know her. In the same way, this story would reflect the community's confusion about how someone could act in such an antisocial manner and disgust at the effect Abner's actions had on others.
Although Faulkner could have written this story from a variety of perspectives, the story as written is a fascinating look at a father-son relationship when the father is an antisocial arsonist.
I'm not sure if the question is listing options for the answer, or if the question is requiring an answer about each point of view.
The story is told from Sarty's point of view, so readers get a nice look into the internal conflicts that Sarty has. Despite being Abner's son, Sarty has a much stronger sense of right and wrong than does his father. It's why he wrestles with telling the truth in court and running to warn Major de Spain. Sarty wants to do right by his father because he still considers his dad a hero; however, Sarty knows that burning down people's barns and rubbing poop into their rugs is wrong.
If the story were told from Abner's point of view, readers would not get a story of warring emotions. Abner's point of view would likely be one of extreme hatred and bitterness at his lot in life. Readers would get to "understand" his justification for burning down people's barns. We would get to know why he so hates men like de Spain.
If the story was told from a community member's point of view, the story would feel much more distant. We would only get to experience what that person sees instead of being able to listen in on what Sarty is thinking and feeling.
No comments:
Post a Comment