We can think of a civilization like a business. If it expands too quickly without properly examining whether it can sustain itself in new markets, then it may quickly crash. Historically, civilizations that have spread very rapidly through military conquests later found that they had a difficult time holding on to these areas. In many ways it is like a company that experiences rapid growth and moves into new areas only for a lack of demand and poor logistics to end up breaking it. Empires from the Mongols to the Greeks made huge land conquests but then had trouble establishing political institutions to govern those conquests. As their armies left, those conquered areas quickly regained their own power.
Another way civilizations can decline is through maltreatment of their conquered subjects. When Hernan Cortes arrived in Mexico, he had an army of around 500 soldiers. Yet, he managed to conquer the mighty Aztec empire. How was this possible? The Aztecs were ruthless toward neighboring tribes and kingdoms, using them for slave labor and sacrificial victims. When Cortes arrived, the Aztecs' rivals and those that suffered under them joined in his conquest. The former Soviet Union was somewhat similar when it eventually collapsed (although much less bloody). Its strong-arm tactics against its satellite republics meant that there was no reason for them to stick by once the Soviet collapse was imminent.
Another way is through an inability to maintain a frontier when faced with economic instability brought on by climate change. The kingdom of Angkor in Cambodia may have suffered this fate, as did the Anasazi of the southwestern US. Drought may have affected both those kingdoms' ability to maintain their agricultural yields, which eventually led to a decline in wealth. As the kingdoms could no longer feed a standing army, those peasants on the periphery would have no reason to continue to submit their harvests (which were a form of taxation). This compounded the problem, making the periphery close further in as peasants simply moved outside of the sphere of influence of the center.
I would recommend reading the following book by Jared Diamond who covers this concept in detail.
Reference:
Diamond, Jared. 1997. Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.
Friday, August 10, 2018
How could developments that led to the expansion of civilization also lead to its decline?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Summarize the major research findings of "Toward an experimental ecology of human development."
Based on findings of prior research, the author, Bronfenbrenner proposes that methods for natural observation research have been applied in ...
-
One way to support this thesis is to explain how these great men changed the world. Indeed, Alexander the Great (356–323 BC) was the quintes...
-
Polysyndeton refers to using several conjunctions in a row to achieve a dramatic effect. That can be seen in this sentence about the child: ...
-
Both boys are very charismatic and use their charisma to persuade others to follow them. The key difference of course is that Ralph uses his...
-
Equation of a tangent line to the graph of function f at point (x_0,y_0) is given by y=y_0+f'(x_0)(x-x_0). The first step to finding eq...
-
At the most basic level, thunderstorms and blizzards are specific weather phenomena that occur most frequently within particular seasonal cl...
-
Population policy is any kind of government policy that is designed to somehow regulate or control the rate of population growth. It include...
-
Gulliver cooperates with the Lilliputians because he is so interested in them. He could, obviously, squash them underfoot, but he seems to b...
No comments:
Post a Comment